Compare those three websites

    After compare those three websites, I think those three articles shows a similar main ideal . That is computer does not always benefit people with it's result. In the first article "Eli Pariser: Beware online "filter bubbles",it shows people always get news and result from what they interested ,because the computer already know what you like to visit. According to the article, " Eli Pariser argues powerfully that this will ultimately prove to be bad for us and bad for democracy." In other words, sometimes network has bad influences of our lives. In the second article, "Mind Control & the Internet" by Sue Halpern. the author shows a fact in the article, that is two people search the same word in the same searching tool, and they compare the result they get, the result is so much difference. As we could see many other websites has do the same thing, only show us the things people are interest in. Similar to the third article,"Clive Thompson on High-Bandwidth Buddies" by Clive Thompson point out a friend only tell people something about him instead of the whole thing just like the searching tool does to us. In conclusion, people has always to see both sides of a thing, not only focus on  what you interested in.